Looking closer at the so-called ‘Rural Health Act’

To the editor:

Those of us in Pennsylvania’s 12th Congressional District represented by Fred Keller recently received a survey soliciting a response on supporting “rural” hospitals. The question as posed: “Do you agree that we must support our rural hospitals and make services more affordable?” The choices are: yes, no or unsure.

My first reaction was I live in a rural area, so this must be good for me. Then I pondered the question and wondered: is this survey, like so many other political polls, slanted to confirm a preferred outcome?

So I decided to rephrase the question in an effort to give voters of the 12th District a broader perspective on the issue. Herein is the revised, illuminated version of the same survey question:

In addition to being taxed for the following government-mandated “health care” related programs: ACA (Obamacare), Medicaid, WIC, CHIP, veterans programs, Medicare, community health centers — Pa., public school nurses, inflated hospital prices to support non-payers, e.g. illegal aliens (note: list is not all inclusive), I would also support a larger portion of my income being taken to subsidize select “rural” hospitals.

Choices: (a) agree, (b) disagree, (c) incompetent.

I would encourage you rot contact Congressman Keller’s office to let him know your position.

Robert Allen



Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

I'm interested in (please check all that apply)